Revisiting the Great Innovation Debate

Courtesy of Wonderfully Complex's photostream on flickr.

Courtesy of Wonderfully Complex’s photostream on flickr.

An early Skilful Minds post introduced The Great Innovation Debate, focusing on the distinctions between Tom Friedland’s conception that when it comes to innovation the world is flat, and the alternative point of view espoused by Richard Florida that the world is spiky. Meaning that the aggregation of creative people in cities, in proximity to one another, largely drives innovation and economic growth. As our previous post noted, John Hagel added an interesting vantage point on the debate by observing that, “Even though you can participate in innovation from more remote locations, if you want to develop your talent more rapidly than others, you are more likely to be able to do that in a major urban area.” In other words, the debate about innovation is largely a difference of viewpoints on the feasibility of effective collaboration across distributed people who work together to get jobs done. These collective efforts typically exist as cross-functional teams working with business partners, or customers.

The innovation debate was raised again recently when John Hagel and John Seely Brown added substantially to the questions behind it in a post titled, Friedmand vs. Florida and offered some key insights that coincide with key points from the McKinsey survey. The gist of Hagel and Brown’s position goes as follows:

It’s true that globalization has led to increased competition; however, there is also a significant opportunity for companies to access the talent gathering in different spike cities and then connect those people around the world using digital technology infrastructure so that they might leverage the skills of, and learn from, one another. Such a model does not develop overnight; to move from competitors to collaborators, participants must form long-term, trust-based relationships with one another.  When these relationships develop, then firms can connect capabilities across spikes, and ultimately, pursue opportunities for innovation and capability building across spikes.

Consider the following observations from recent research on the importance of proximity in how team members relate to one another. A recent Forrestor report, Making Collaboration Work for the 21st Century’s Distributed Workforce (registration required) noted that most information workers (including Gen Yers) prefer email, telephone conversations, and face-to-face meetings. These preferences appear to result as much from limitations in the available collaboration tools as anything else. The Forrestor recommendations are three-fold:

  1. create the sense of a “shared office” among distributed employees
  2. use tools that follow distributed employees on the go
  3. provide collaboration tools that make the work easier, i.e. are integrated into the work.

I’ll get back to the major challenge among the three outlined in the Forrestor report (creating the sense of a shared office) in a following post. First though it is important to note that the Forrestor report’s findings indicate fundamental differences between the opposing points of view in the debate over innovation by Friedland and Florida, especially as they relate to distributed employees (i.e. people who are not colocated). For example, a recent McKinsey Global Survey of 2,927 executives, Making Innovation Structures Work (registration required), offered two key insights dealing with innovation that merit attention in relation to the topic.

  1. “Companies cannot rely on a single innovation function alone to create successful outcomes, it must be integrated with the entire organization.”
  2. “The functions located near talent or target markets have more market success and meet objectives more effectively than others, though they are less likely than the functions at or near HQ to engage regularly with company leaders.”

The first conclusion relates to the McKinsey report’s overall insight that organizations are more likely to succeed with innovation efforts when those initiatives are integrated with corporate strategy as well as benefiting from the engagement and support of company leadership. It implicitly recognizes the ineffectiveness of organizing innovation efforts that occur in corporate silos, such as innovation centers or research & development labs.

On the other hand, the second conclusion recognizes the constraints faced in organizing innovation efforts among distributed employees. Creating a sense of a shared office, or workspace, is fundamental to efforts attempting to integrate innovation and corporate strategy, especially if the corporate strategy involves social business.

In my thinking, the key to Hagel and Brown’s point is that, as Gunter Sonnenfeld recently observed in a post called Relationship Economics, “relationships are the foundation of the social web, and the basis for the flat, seemingly infinite distribution plane that is the Internet.”  Rather than focus on whether the world is flat or spiky, serious attention is better paid to how enterprises organize collaboration and what limitations place and cultural context impose on that organizational effort to create innovation capabilities. How to organize distributed collaboration and manage the social interactions involved is the topic that requires discussion when these concerns are brought into focus.

About these ads

15 Responses to Revisiting the Great Innovation Debate

  1. Margie says:

    Great article! We are linking to this particularly great post on our website. Keep up the good writing.

  2. CHRIS says:

    I will immediately take hold of your rss as I can’t find your e-mail subscription hyperlink or newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Kindly allow me recognize in order that I could subscribe. Thanks.

  3. Garrett says:

    I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours as of late, yet I never found any attention-grabbing article like yours. It’s lovely price enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content material as you did, the web might be a lot more useful than ever before.

  4. Cora says:

    If you wish for to obtain much from this article then you have to apply these methods to your won weblog.

  5. Florentina says:

    Hey there! I know this is kind of off-topic but I had to ask. Does managing a well-established website such as yours take a massive amount work? I am completely new to operating a blog but I do write in my journal every day. I’d like to start a blog so I can share my experience and thoughts online. Please let me know if you have any ideas or tips for brand new aspiring bloggers. Thankyou!

  6. Maria says:

    While MAC computers still use Google and there is no option to download a Bing toolbar (ironic because Google and Apple are seemingly bigger competitors than Apple and Microsoft), more people, in this economy, are buying PCs. The sedan is of course attractive and it can also attain up to 36 mpg even on the highway, and this is the reason why the 2012 buick lacrosse is considered to be s different from that of the other models. It is not enough to watch the master in action – guess what else is required.

  7. Karine says:

    Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your post seem to be running off the screen in Firefox. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know. The design look great though! Hope you get the problem solved soon. Kudos

  8. Onita says:

    Udvartana is a very good Ayurvedic massage where by dry herbal powders are used with very little oil. And it doesn’t seem like this problem is going to go away by itself. Our team of Diet Consultants designs the diet plans and diet programs as per each individual need.

  9. Katherin says:

    As the starting time you have to refer a friend script and also essential to have web hosting for PHP. If your site or blog fails function properly, refuses to open or even crashes, you will find it frustrating and costly to try to then find an alternative web host and move your images, text, video and backup data. With countless new websites going live everyday, a web hosting business is a profitable business to run.

  10. Lionel says:

    all over Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex, Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire, Lincolnshire, London and the rest of the UK, Tommy Winn has also performed in mainland Europe and the United States. Brackley Industries is the home of lockable DVD cases and a wide range of retail security products including safers, electronic line alarms and powered and secured product displays. You can also make use of these technological developments either for authentic tunes creation or a devoted web user or the film industry.

  11. Chastity says:

    Pretty portion of content. I simply stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact loved account your weblog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your feeds and even I fulfillment you access constantly rapidly.

  12. Roosevelt says:

    Quality posts is the main to attract the users to pay a visit the web page, that’s what this web page is providing.

  13. Rosario says:

    I love what you guys are usually up too. This kind of clever work and reporting! Keep up the very good works guys I’ve you guys to my personal blogroll.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 45 other followers

%d bloggers like this: